So you’re able to contrast our very own 2nd hypothesis, i earliest recoded, for every of the things that on standing measure, the fresh new percentage of solutions you to show if the husbands have less, equivalent or higher scores, particularly, reputation, with hypogamy, and therefore husbands has actually lower position than just wives, homogamy, meaning equivalent standing, and hypergamy, definition husbands having high reputation than just wives. Into possible relationship off nation, analyses was basically high into the degree (X 2 =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you will monetary perception regarding a possible separation and divorce (X dos =9.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Research showed that, getting Language participants, there is certainly significantly more degree hypogamy, while to have Dominican people there was even more education homogamy. Concerning financial affairs in case of separation, while there is much more homogamy getting Spanish participants, you will find a whole lot more hypergamy to have Dominicans (look for Contour step 1).
Having previous failed marriages or not wasn’t related so you’re able to variations in updates. About the possible relationship ranging from position and decades partnered, high contacts had been found in health (X 2 =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), and while to possess couples y is available (40.4%, each), to have people y exists (43.4%). In other words, on classification with more age hitched, husbands provides all the way down fitness reputation. Having youngsters of prior marriages and having children out-of latest wedding failed to significantly connect with position.
Within the sum, the brand new analyses towards next theory showed that as opposed to our very own criterion, the biggest ability related to help you standing is siti incontri per persone nere the country.
Univariate evaluation revealed significant differences in basis 1 (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
Fundamentally, hypogamy points inside The country of spain obtained rather less than hypogamy factors inside Dominican Republic
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).